Cold Mountain was a hard book for me to get my self to read. I had to be very disciplined in my reading to keep myself going. I started with 10 pages a day but I realized at the rate I was going I would never get done. So I had to push myself to get a chapter in at a time. I found when I started to read a chapter a day I could follow the story a little easier cause I knew whose point of view I was in. I wasn’t trying to remember wait whose chapter am I in Inman or Ada? Soon I was actually reading more than just a chapter. I was reading a few chapters at a time because I was actually interested. It just took me awhile to actually become interested in what I was reading. It is nice when you actually like a book and you aren’t thinking to yourself “OMG I have 8 more pages till the end of this chapter”.
It’s a good book with a lot of description and thought put into each sentence. The long pros with the colorful adjectives that descried the nouns. She would focus on details that weren’t part of the story but would give you and image that supports the story. When you are finished reading the paragraph she would have given you a feeling for the story by using the details. That’s the aspect of the text that I would like to discuss. I think a lot of people will be talking about the descriptive writing style Charles Frazier uses in their blogs. I think that it is one of the first things you realize when you read the first page of the book. Right off the batt Charles Frazier is givng deep description about the flys that are flying around Inman. It’s an interesting writing style that Charles uses. It might be a natural style of writing for Charles or maybe Charles really tried hard to use that style and to make the book more descriptive.
I personally don’t really like how descriptive Charles can be. I think it’s casues the book to drag on and can take it awhile sometimes to get to the point. Instead of talking about where Inman is trying to get to Charles talks about the trees that Inman is passing. Like I don’t really care a whole two pages about the types of trees in the forest. I think in the time spent being descriptive about some detail Charles could get to the point faster. I think it that would make the book so much shorter. I wouldn’t dread turning every page as much if it wasn’t so run on. I respect the way Charles decided to write the book because it takes a lot of time and thought. I also respect people who enjoy reading descriptive books. I feel like it takes a lot of patience to really enjoy the long descriptive sentences. One thing my dad said when I told him I was reading it. He told me to try not to rush it because if all I was doing was trying to read to get it done it would feel like it would take forever to get thrugh the book. If I just read it for the enjoyment of it I would like it more. Of course I didn’t take him seriously when he told me that before I started reading but now I understand what he meant. It is not a book to rush. It is a book to take time and enjoy.
Looking back on the book I do think I had moments of pure enjoyment. I liked the story line and when Charles focused more on that than the details. The long descriptive writing has an certain appeal that makes this book very good. It is just not my cup of tea. Meeting the author will be a lot of fun. I want to ask Charles if he had to work on this book to be so descriptive or if it just came natural to him. If he is modeling another writer who he admires or if it is just how he like to write. It is a good book that just takes some time to motivate yourself to read.